Social history of the Victorian age
Condition of life and labor
The hidden
world of the Victorian working classes
Within what seemed a closed
and rigid social structure the working classes constructed their own exclusive
world, remote from the acquisitive, accumulative impulses of Victorian economy.
In past, it was an escape from the harshness of real world, in part an attempt
to create community in the anonymity of the Industrial town. Ultimately,
through the growth of education and democracy, improvement in living standards,
working condition, housing food and dress, the working classes became, to a
degree, participant member of society, but for most of the period covered by
these writing they were both excluded, and excluded themselves, from public
life. Behind the great public institution and images of the Victorian age the
working classes inhabited an inner, secret life which perpetuated traditional
values and pattern of behavior, essentially of rural origin. Into the new urban
industrial society. In past times almost the whole life, including work, had
gone forward within the circle of the family; increasingly, as the nineteenth
century progressed, though much less quickly than is commonly supposed, work
became separated from the family and the home, and the new cult of work sought
to erect it into the center of human existence. The working classes, it seems,
for long rejected this unpalatable and alien notion.
Child labor
That the shameful practice of
child labor should have played an important role in the Industrial Revolution
from its outset is not to be wondered at. The displaced working classes, from
the seventeenth century on, took it for granted that a family would not be able
to support itself if the children were not employed. In Defoe’s day he thought
it admirable that in the vicinity of Halifax scarcely anybody above the age of
the 4 was idle. The children of the poor were forced by economic condition to
work, as Dickens, with his family in debtor’s prison, worked at age 12 in the
Blacking Factory. In 1840 perhaps only twenty percent of the children of London
had any schooling, a number which had risen by 1860, when perhaps half of the
children of between 5 and 15 were in some sort of school, if only a day school
or a Sunday school; the others were working many of the more fortunate found
employment as apprentices to respectable trades or as general servants there
were over 120,000 domestic servants in London alone at mid-century, who worked
80 hour week for one halfpence per hour but many more were not so lucky. Most
prostitutes between 15 and 22 year of age.
Many children worked 16 hour
days under atrocious condition, as their elders did. Ineffective parliamentary
acts to regulate the work of workhouse children in factories and cotton mills
to 12 hour per day had been passed as early as 1802 and 1819. After radical
agitation, notably in 1831, when “short time committees” organized largely by
evangelicals began to demand a ten hour day, a royal commission established by
the Whig government recommended in 1833 that children aged 11-18 be permitted
to work a maximum of twelve hour per day. After further radical agitation,
another act in 1847 limited both adults and children to ten hour of work daily.
What cause
an increase child labor during Victorian times?
1) Child labor played an important part
of agriculture life-children always helped on the farm, on which fourteen hour
days were not uncommon-so it’s not surprising that it continued when people
moved from the country to the city.
2) Since mechanization often created
condition in which adult male strength and skill lost much of its importance,
children who were paid much less than adult males, became widely employable.
3) Young children had jobs in which
their small size and agility made them better qualified than adult men and
women. For example, Slater mill in Pawtucket, Rhode island, the first textile
mill in America that began marked the beginning of the North America industrial
revolution, employed young boys to dart rapidly moving machinery to fix broken
threads while machines work at top speed, often at the cost of terrible
accidents in which children lost hands or arms.
Victorian
working women: sweated labor
There is modern myth to the
effect that until quite recent years the vast majority of women devoted themselves exclusively to
home-making and the bearing and rearing of large families, and that only a few
engaged in gainful employment. What has, in fact, changed is that more married
women and more middle class women now work than formerly. Given the huge size
of Victorian working class, the demographic consideration that because of the
unequal sex ratio one in three women were “doomed” to spinsterhood anyway, and
the fact that the wages of many semi-skilled and unskilled made workers were
low or so uncertain that they would not support a family unless supplemented by
the earnings of wives and children, it cannot be doubted that a high proportion
of victorian women, both single and married, regularly engaged in paid work.
Victorian women provided a
vast reservoir of labor, necessary for an expanding though immature economy
whose fluctuations demanded additional workers at one time, fewer at another.
The precise size of the female working population is impossible to know since
the census returns almost certainly underestimated it; the numbers of women
factory workers may well have been more as less accurate, domestic servants
probably rather less so, but thousand of milliners and seamstresses,
washerwomen, framework knitters, nailers, straw-plaiters and women worker in
the score or more of ‘sweated’ trade where they worked in their own homes,
sometimes whole-time, sometimes part-time, must have escaped the census
investigators, especially when it was feared that penalties might follow from a
full declaration of income. The census of 1851, the first to attempt to count
occupations in any detail, gave a total of 2.8 million women and girls over the
age of ten in employment out of a female population of 10.1 millions, forming a
proportion of 30.2 percent of the whole labor force. Domestic service took by
far the greatest number in 1851-905,000, not including 145,000 washerwomen and
55,000 charwomen.
Women of the “lower” working class
The lower working classes
were distinguished from the upper by having less education, no pretensions to
gentility, fewer resources or opportunities and, in some cases, simply less
luck. Unlike many other towns, Hastings had no large industry except fishing, a
male occupation. some women prepared and sold fish, or male and repaired nets,
but most lower working class women were engaged in servicing the wealthy
residents and visitors in one way or another. Roughly half of all employed
women in Hastings were in domestic service. Others were barmaids, waitress and
chambermaids. In 1860 there were strikes by some of the town’s washerwomen.
While ‘upper’ working class women
rented shops, the ‘lower’ hawked on the streets and beaches. They sold flowers,
toffee apples, ice-cream, cold drinks, shrimps, oysters and whelks, and offered
donkey and goat rides and even fortune-telling, sometimes by budgerigar. For
some late nineteenth century photographs.
For recreation they crowded
into taverns, the women joining in the noisy revelry. Drunkenness was a
problem, as was violence. For example see the Hasting’ newspaper report from
the 1850s.
One of the problems in
Hastings was the seasonal nature of women’s work in the town: in the winter
months many who made a living from selling goods and service to visitors had no
income. A good number were obliged to accept charity or to reply on almost
as-poor relation. Some slipped permanently into the underclass. Low-class
prostitution was rife throughout the mid-century and Hastings had its share.
Race, class, and gender issues
Race and
class prejudices and the childlike
Fricans and other supposedly
inferior groups, such as Irishmen, Indians, Maoris, and women, all displayed,
it was held, childlike characteristic. Thus The
Saturday Review of 8 September 1866 could refer to the Indian as “childish
and impulsive”, the term impulsive referring to lack of weighed, considered
thought. Similarly, Francis Galton’s “Hereditary Talent and character” in the
1865 Macmillan’s magazine argued that
“the Negro has strong impulsive habits, and neither patience, reticence, nor
dignity”. This prejudice had behind it the scientific theories of arrested
development and recapitulates the adults of more primitive ancestors. If Irish
adults, for example, display “child-like” emotions or conduct, then they are
clearly closer to primitive early man.
Herbert Spencer similarly
argued that “the intellectual traits of the un civilized….are traits recurring
in the children of the civilized’. This emphasis upon the childlike qualities
of supposedly lower races certainly parallels the frequent references one comes
across of the immature working classes. Repeatedly one reads that they had no
thought for the morrow that they wallowed in instant gratification, and that
they were irresponsible, impulsive, and self-indulgent, spending a week’s wages
on ribbons or a hat.
Social class
Class is a complex term in
use since the late eighteenth century, and employed in many different ways. In
our context classes are the more or less distinct social groupings which at any
given historical period, taken as a whole, constituted British society.
Different social classes can be distinguished by inequalities in such areas as
power, authority, wealth, working, and living condition, life-style, life-span,
education, religion, and culture.
Early in the nineteenth
century the labels “working classes” and “middle classes” were already coming
into common usage. The old hereditary aristocracy, reinforced into on “upper
class” which tenaciously maintained control over the political system, depriving
not the working classes but the middle classes of a voice in the political
process. The increasingly powerful middle classes, however, undertook organized
agitation to rapidly this situation: the passage of the reform act of 1832 and
the abolition of the Corn Laws in 1846 were intimation of the extent to which
they would ultimately be successful.
The working classes, however,
remained shut out from the political process, and became increasingly hostile
not only to the aristocracy but to the middle classes as well. As the
industrial revolution progressed there was further social stratification.
Capitalist, for example, employed industrial workers who were one component of
the working classes, but beneath the industrial workers was a submerged “under
class”- contemporaries referred to them as the “sunken people”- which lived in
poverty. In mid-century skilled workers had acquired enough power to enable
them to establish trade unions which they to further improve their status,
while unskilled workers and the underclass beneath them remained much more
susceptible to exploitation, and were therefore exploited.
The basic hierarchical
structure comprising the “upper classes”, the “middle classes” the “working
classes”, and the impoverished “under class” remained relatively stable despite
periodic upheavals, and despite the Marxist view of the inevitability of class
conflict, at least until the outbreak of world war 1 . A modified class
structure clearly remains in existence today.
Liberalism and cultural shock in the
Victorian age
Most textbooks correctly
stress that the liberalism characterized the Victorian legislative mind and was
central to Victorian middle-class needs and national ideals. Here are some of
the legislative changes in the period of the “age of Reform”:
1829-
Catholic emancipation act enables catholic to sit in parliament.
1832-
Parliamentary Reform act enfranchises the middle classes; now one in five
adult males have the vote.
1833- Ten of
22 church of Ireland sees are united, that is, abolished.
1834- Poor
law Amendment act replaces outdoor relief by poor houses.
1838-
Character of London University creates a non-denominational university.
1850-
Catholic hierarchy restored in England.
1854, 1856-
Oxford and Cambridge open to non conformist undergraduates
1858- Jewish
emancipation act: Jews can now enter parliament
Each of these act, which
contributed importantly to the progress towards a much more diverse and open
society, also produced a sharp reaction. After all, what an enormous challenge
to the Anglican establishment this reform represented and what lightning
changes. Nonconformists, catholic, and Jews now voted in a parliament responsible
for Anglican ritual and organization; the Catholic Church was allowed, for the
first time since Mary Tudor’s day, to re-establish its entire hierarchy.
Nonconformists could now enroll in those seminaries for Anglican ministers,
oxford and Cambridge; and, by the Reform Act, and town governments and
possessed a non-denominational university of their own in the nation’s capital.
These reforms also challenged established society as well as the established
church. Liberalism thus represented the threat of pluralistic, relativistic,
open society.
Arts and culture
Royal
academy and other galleries
Art student
Music:-
Social
taradiddles
Social taradiddles George du
Maurier scanned image and text by George p. Landow. This is one of du Maurier’s
many satiric commentaries in the common combination of pretentiousness with
ignorance of the arts. It is also exemplifies the action of what Michel Focult
terms the “author function”- the process by which a name becomes a guarantee of
supposed aesthetic quality and aesthetic homogeneity.
Hi Rasila. There is some typo error so check it and u tried well.
ReplyDelete